Means of Grace, Hope of Glory

Monday
Aug032015

A life, not a program

Benedictine spirituality is a way of life not a parish program.

Benedict is at the heart of our Episcopal tradition. It’s there in the shape of the Prayer Book (2/3 plus for the Eucharist and the Daily Office); in the assumption that the Office is a public, communal parish activity; in our inclination toward paradox and managing polarities; in our love of balance and moderation; and in our history since St. Augustine of Canterbury. We see it during the periods when one of us writes a book on Benedictine spirituality and there is a rush to read and understand. It’s as though someone has pointed us toward home and we have recognized the texture and character of it as our own.

When a parish engages Benedictine spirituality it can feel like returning home. What was partial and veiled is now fuller and revealed. It’s an experience of what we learned in early strategic planning (pay more attention to your strengths and opportunities than to your weaknesses and the threats) and Appreciative Inquiry’s insights about building upon what you do well.  It’s part of our DNA. Something to be accepted and in this case embraced.

You can tell when a parish is treating it as a program when:

1.     There are occasional programs on Benedictine spirituality

2.     There may be a small group on Benedictine spirituality, and

3.     The central processes, structure and climate of parish life are largely untouched by a deeper Benedictine spirituality.

 

Processes, structures and climate that reflect a Benedictine spirituality

When a parish does shape its life so those central processes, structures and climate reflect a Benedictine spirituality then, and only then, are we able to speak of it being “a life” and not “a program.” Here are a few examples of what that looks like:

1. The parish offers a public daily office

More generally the parish works at training and coaching members to use the Daily Office in some form. There is usually a strong interplay between the parish having a daily public office and significant numbers of members either attending or incorporating the Office into their own practice.

 
2. The relationship among take-counsel, no grumbling, and humility is active and nurtured.

The parish has regular opportunities to hear itself with face-to-face, structured conversations on the parish community’s important issues. The norms and climate of the parish discourage grumbling while encouraging people to participate in the opportunities to “take counsel.” And in the formation process members are guided in the ways of humility; ways that include submitting oneself to listening to others in the parish and cooperating with parish leaders.

3. The polarity of hospitality and boundaries is managed.

The parish makes it easy for visitors and new members to feel at welcomed and it offers a clear pathway into an abundant and rooted relationship with Christ and his church. The parish doesn’t lose the balance by engaging in the superficial practice and language of “radical hospitality” or by creating an environment that is less than fully welcoming.


4. The formation process is structured so that a new member is able to learn the core practices of Christian living in the first few years of membership.

Whether the parish is large or small we find a way to help new members become proficient in the core Christian practices related to Eucharist, Daily Office, life in community, being reflective, and service.


5. Moderation and balance 

There are expectations and standards along with flexibility and adaptation to need.

 

Neither a shadow nor an excess

It helps to be aware of what it looks like when we go off the rails. What we seek here is not a life that is like a phantom; a life that has the appearance of being real while being illusionary. And we are also not seeking a life that is an imprudent application of monastic life to the parish church.

We can use the daily office as an example of each. There are parishes that have a link to the Office on their web site and maybe even mention it in the formation process yet have no significant expression of a public offering of the Daily Prayers of the Church or of actually equipping members to say the Office as part of their spiritual practice.

At the other extreme there are parishes that put on a pretend monasticism in the Office – the BCP is replaced with some “richer” book, antiphons are added, and the service gets longer and longer. 

A thoughtful pastoral theology

Most of our parishes lack a thoughtful pastoral theology to guide the common life. Benedictine spirituality provides an element of such a theology. A pastoral theology that is grounded in Benedictine spirituality and Anglican tradition, while drawing on the useful insights of organizational psychology, can offer the parish a more integrated and complete life. Once we “get it” parish life becomes easier and more fruitful. 

rag+

 

Related resources

Many of Esther de Waal’s books

        de Wall's books

Much of Martin Thornton’s work

Thornton books in print

 The starting place is with "Christian Proficiency" and "Pastoral Theology." His other books are best understood if you have read these.

Free Chapters of his books


Various postings on Thornton's work

Writing by Kenneth Leech in Soul Friend

The Principles behind Thornton's work

The Faithful Remnant

Five Martin Thornton insights into the Divine Office 

The Every Daily Office

 

Order of the Ascension

       OA web site

A dispersed Benedictine community with a charism for the development of parish churches grounded in Anglican pastoral and ascetical theology, especially Benedictine spirituality. OA draws on the fields of organization development and organizational psychology. This undergirds the community's life of liturgical worship, the spiritual dynamics of the Promise, and mutual friendship. 

                 Books from OA   

Wednesday
Jul292015

Parish development resources: Episcopal Ethos, the Daily Office

Episcopal Ethos

I know some of you are working at communicating the ethos of your parish. Expressing an ethos that is both firmly grounded in Anglican (and Benedictine) spirituality and unique for that parish community can increase loyalty and reduce conflict.

 

1. These posters are a great example of being what you are and also being light about it. See posters

 

2. Parish statements on ethos

 

3. Material you can cut and paste
On the web site of the Order of the Ascension -- see the items under Parish Spirituality on the right side of the page. You can lift the material and use it. Give credit 
  
4. From Derek Olsen on Episcopal Cafe - be sure to read the comments, note the comment re black and white pictures

 

 

6. An Alban posting - R. Mark King: Church Ethos 

 

I thought some of you might find this useful. He's using Edgar Schein's understanding of organizational culture in regard to his very famous NYC church. I don't think he has Schein quite right but it's close.
The organizational culture approach begins with who we are, what's the DNA? It assumes that parish's have a life that isn't simply "made-up" by the current players. A mix of "the way we do things," espoused values, and deeper underlying assumptions. The tension among the three elements is often the way into a deeper understanding of our parish ethos as well as the beginning of a deeper and richer parish culture.
Our work over many years with Benedict, Thornton and such, is about grounding parishes in something deeper and richer than what we tend to make up in creating mission statements, visions, and strategic plans. We are saying to our parishes -- "You are an expression of a-way-of-being-the-church that has roots. Our task, in our time, is to maintain and deepen our roots, to be nurtured by them, and draw on the wisdom they provide for living faithfully in the contemporary world." 

 

Doing the Daily Office

 

It's easy to get confused about this. 
  • Some Protestant traditions still dislike set forms of prayer. That's where we get these stories about CPE directors insisting that you engage in spontaneous prayer. After all it's more "real." Many people would be relieved to have the priest or pastor pray ancient and graceful collects from the BCP instead of awkwardly trying to be spontaneous.
  • Then there's the Roman Catholic tradition of the priest saying the Breviary, the pious laity going to daily mass, and a few people knowing about the Liturgy of the Hours. The Episcopal tradition is to make the Daily Prayers of the Church accessible and available to the laity. Many parishes are doing just that.
  • Then there's some Episcopalian in Texas who thinks that personal prayer comes before corporate liturgy; missing how in our tradition the Office and the Eucharist shape our personal devotions and reflections. 
  • We also have Episcopal clergy who feel as though they "should" have the church building open for personal devotions when the parish has 1) no way to manage that and 2) it's not our tradition - ours is opening up for the Daily Office. 
  • The Daily Office of the BCP was shaped for a parish church offering a public office. Obviously it can be used by individuals as well. This is a very different use from the monastic, or the cathedral, or the priest's Breviary.
 
Here are a number of links to material on the Office -- some better than others, a few probably falling into one of the above errors (hey, but at least their working on it).
1. This video is part of the SCP PR effort. But the story he tells is about how he and his parish engaged the Daily Office. The video
2. A Living Church article on Daily Office related apps. The article 
3. "Seven Times A Day I Praise You: Prayer Books for Daily Use" by Br. Martin Dally  The article
4. "Introducing the Daily Office into a parish's DNA" by Michelle Heyne  The posting
5. Tutorials/explanations in parish churches and other
https://onemansweb.org/theology/thinking-on-prayer/praying-the-daily-office.html

 

Note - there are what I see as errors in a a few places but on the whole the material might be useful as a staring place in developing your own web pages.

 

6. Takes on the Office from differing traditions
      A Nashotah student 
      A Presbyterian

 

7. Especially the appendix material in Fill All Things: The Dynamics of Spirituality in the Parish Church - provides coaching in getting a public office started and maintained.
   
Chapters on the Office in the In "Your Holy Spirit" books - Traditional Spiritual Practices in Today's Christian Life  and Shaping the Parish Through Spiritual Practice
rag+

 

Monday
Jul272015

Caesura: Picking quarrels and provoking trouble

The Chinese government has a law against “picking quarrels and provoking trouble.” It uses the law to suppress dissent and undercut the development of civil society.[1] Given the country's history it's understandable for leaders to be concerned about maintaining harmony. Our St. Benedict had the same concern for harmony. He wanted no grumbling in the monastery.

The problem comes when we maintain harmony and neglect taking counsel.

The Episcopal Church and its parishes have no law against “picking quarrels and provoking trouble.”  There is no canon or parish bylaw that uses, or would use, such language. Our church culture however has norms that end up creating the same condition. Useful and constructive voices are suppressed along with the chronically unhappy.

There are few parishes that have the structures, processes, and climate necessary to facilitate a parish life characterized by both harmony and the open expression and flow of information and ideas. We tilt toward harmony and seem to establish methods of open conversation only when that harmony is endangered. 

We concern ourselves with building trust after trust is already compromised. Benedict paired a no grumbling norm with a taking counsel norm.

Part of the problem is that most clergy and lay leaders lack the skills needed to make trust development a routine part of parish life. We don’t understand the theories and models that can offer conceptual clarity and we lack the skills to manage both grumbling and taking counsel in the parish community. There are exceptions. People that have completed one of the more substantial training programs in parish development[2] are somewhat more likely to be able to manage the polarity. There are some who have picked up the needed knowledge and skills in other places.

A second element in the problem is that we fear power and control. We see it in the frequent sermons attacking hierarchy even though the fact is that we are a hierarchal church (and that there is no human system without some form of hierarchy.) Exploring this second element will need to wait until another time.

What can we do?

1.     Recognize the problem.

2.     Expand the number of dioceses doing a substantial program in congregational development-- Church Development Institute, College for Congregational Development, Shaping the Parish. It’s good to see that the Diocese of Long Island is beginning a CDI.

3.     Provide follow through coaching and support for those attending and those that have completed the programs. Most of those attending such programs understand what the issue is, and have some familiarity with the needed competencies, but have not changed the pattern in their own parish. Even a two-year training program isn’t able to provide all that’s needed. Ongoing support and coaching is necessary both as part of these programs and for a couple of years after.

4.     Work with seminaries. It would be relatively easy to shape seminary education so that by the time a seminarian has completed the three years he or she: is able to facilitate small groups in decision making processes, has clarity about personal strengths and weaknesses, understands the impact they have on others in a group, has developed a sustainable spiritual practice, and so on. These competencies are not enough in themselves to manage the polarity in parish life but they are a first step.

It’s understandable that parish leaders will continue the practice of maintaining harmony by avoiding conversation and gently suppressing threats to harmony. If we seek parish communities with both harmony and useful “taking counsel” we need to improve our equipping of first, the parish clergy in charge of congregations, and secondly, a core of lay leaders in each congregation.

rag+

--------------

[1] China Uses Picking Quarrels Charge to Cast a Wider Net Online

[2] Church Development InstituteCollege for Congregational DevelopmentShaping the Parish

 

Caesura    The web page
A program for parish churches
Vaccinating against conflict
Nurturing healthy relationships

 

A List of All Postings

Tuesday
Jul142015

Caesura: Grumbling and taking counsel in the parish community

Always

There will always be grumbling in the parish. Always.

I suspect that the reason Saint Benedict wrote so much about grumbling was because there was so much of it in the monastic community. I doubt Benedict ever believed it would stop. I do think he had a few useful ideas about how to contain it and reduce the damage it did. He also seemed to know how to harness the energy of it for the well being of the community. Some containing and a lot of harnessing of energy might be useful for our parish churches.

No grumbling

First and foremost, there must be no word or sign of the evil of grumbling, no manifestation of it for any reason at all.  (34:6)

Benedict doesn't see anything good in grumbling. He doesn’t want to see any display of grumbling at all. None, for any reason.[1]

We have become so accustomed to accommodating all matters of whining and complaining in parish life that we may miss what Benedict is getting at. What does it do to the person engaged in such fussing? What is the impact on the parish community?

When we are grumbling and bad mouthing others we are undermining the hope within us and others.[2] Our sense of gratitude is lost in irritability and moaning. Our grumbling rises up as our longing for control and certainty slides into frustration and resentment because things are not as we would have them be. 

Our hearts are not able to hold gratitude and grumbling at the same time. We must choose which to nurture.

Benedict connects the no grumbling norm with humility. If you need and receive more from the parish than most members accept it in humility. That will allow the parish to be at peace.[3] It’s the same when the saint writes of obedience. Our listening and responding to others in the parish is to be done gladly not grudgingly with grumbling aloud or in your heart.[4]  When we serve others in the parish is also a potential occasion for grumbling.

There are of course things the parish leaders can do to nurture people in this no grumbling norm.  Many parishes provide a blessing for some roles in the parish. Parish formation processes can explore the issue of grumbling and how it can be off set by humility, prayer and self care.[5]

Leadership that reduces grumbling

I see three things that Benedict might say to the parish’s leaders to reduce grumbling and promote harmony. 

The first is that leaders can be direct about the damage grumbling does in the parish community. For that to be effective it has to happen when things are going well. If leaders, especially clergy, begin to teach about the damage after conflict has emerged in the parish — too late! You will be discounted. Worse yet you will have used Benedict’s insights in your own self interest. When we do that we undercut the validity of the message not only during that time period but into the future. The Gospel gets seen as a tool for political maneuvering.

Second, leaders need to shape the life of the community so there’s no reasonable basis for grumbling. Justifiable grumbling will not arise if the leaders take into account the needs of members in assigning work, providing resources, and a respectful environment. For Benedict that had to do with things like the time of meals, clothing that fit the climate, and the amount of work expected. In the parish church with its coffee hour, occasional meal, and possibly a program to fee the homeless those most involved will want a workable kitchen. Staff members will want reasonable working conditions and fair compensation. The sacristans will want a workable sacristy and adequate funding for liturgy.

Third, parish leaders need to frequently and regularly take counsel with the wider parish community.   

Taking counsel

As it is written: Do everything with counsel and you will not be sorry afterward (Sir 32:24). [The Rule 3:13]

How can we make use of the grumbling? How can the complaints and dreams be put to good use?

In organization development work there’s a presumption that the best way to deal with people’s grumbling is to hear it, learn from it, and use it. The underlying assumption is that there just might be something useful in the new ideas or the resistance to change.[6] Taking this stance helps leaders be less defensive and anxious. And that in turn is likely to keep the parish’s anxiety in manageable bounds and create trust in the leaders.

Before grumbling becomes “grumbling” it’s simply a new feeling and/or thought. It’s an idea that the member believes might be useful. Maybe it’s a concern about some aspect of parish life the person sees as not working very well.

The need is to engage these ideas, hopes, dreams, and concerns in a manner that captures and channels the energy in them for the good of the parish community. The parish needs processes and structures helping the community and its leaders sort out the useful from the not useful, the high priority from the low priority, and the important and developmental from the all the rest.

Much of the grumbling has to do with dissatisfactions and dreams that are of the Spirit. Addressing them builds the community’s sense of competence and trust in its leaders. We need to differentiate this from the chronic grumbler always somewhat aggravated and resentful. The first calls for structures and processes that engage them. The second calls for boundaries and clarity about authority.

Two ways of taking counsel

Saint Benedict had two kinds of consultation in the monastic community—the whole community and the seniors.

The whole community 

Benedict could easily bring the whole community together. The monastery was residential. It was a community under vows including obedience to the abbot. The men lived, worked and prayed within the walls of the monastery. In a parish we need to adapt things to the reality of being a dispersed community in which the primary ministry is carried out in the daily lives of members scattered throughout the region. Participation in any aspect of parish life is voluntary. The “demand system”[7] of people’s lives means that the parish is in competition with family, friendships, workplace and civic life for the time, energy and money of its members.[8]

Parishes can have structured, face-to-face conversation among members several times each year. At least one of those conversations needs to be a look at the whole parish system. It’s an opportunity for people to share anything that seems significant to them. The process needs ways to narrow down to the ideas that the community most wants to pursue, allows the rector and/or vestry to exercise their proper role, and moves some items into a pathway for action. There can also be other conversations about more specific matters – how we do hospitality, the incorporation of new members, our engagement with the homeless in the area. These conversations can be 1 ½ to 2 hours. There may also be very brief testing processes used at coffee hour a few times each year.

Benedict’s assumption was that these whole community gatherings were the time in which the younger members would get to have a voice. There are times when the younger members see the better way.[9]  This isn’t Benedict pandering to a youth obsessed culture. It’s not a form of paternalizing. The younger person may be offering an idea that solves the community’s problem or opens up a new opportunity. Within his broader call “to listen” this becomes a specific arena in which we are to listen. 

The seniors

Benedict also assumes that the long experience and learning of the more senior members provides a wisdom that the leader is to make use of.  If the issues are less important the abbot is to take counsel with the seniors only. Wise rectors develop the practice of occasional conversations with people that have served as wardens over the years and with priests in the parish who may be unpaid priest associates or retired clergy in the pews. 

Humility

The leaders

There’s a spectrum about a parish’s orientation toward power that has become apparent to me over the years. On the one end are parishes where the leaders seem defensive about their power and authority—retired rectors need to have moved onto another parish, vestries have limited roles in search processes for new rectors, and there is little taking counsel outside the formal centers of power. There are other parishes where the atmosphere is more relaxed and less fearful.

Humility is expressed in taking counsel with others.

The members

Members are to offer their ideas and advice. But they are to do this in humility—not obstinately or in defiance but gracefully. We also see this humility when members accept and use the structures provided for consultation.

Grumbling and taking counsel

The two are interdependent. To the extent the parish engages members in a process of structured, face-to-face consultation it is likely to reduce the most destructive forms of grumbling while also gaining from the open expression of the hopes and concerns of its members.

What can we learn from Benedict?

  1. The priest and wardens need to invite the parish community to avoid grumbling and explain why in terms of the community’s and the individual’s spiritual health. A caution: doing this when you sense a wave of strong dissatisfaction building probably will backfire. 
  2. The priest and vestry need to consult with the whole parish community, frequently and regularly The priest and the vestry need to bring all important matters to the parish community for it’s counsel.
  3. The priest needs to informally gather the seniors for consultation with her on less important matters.
  4. The priest and vestry need to maintain clarity that they are to reflect on the thinking of the community and/or the seniors while reserving decisions to themselves.
  5. The parish is a microcosm of the Body of Christ, it is a system. If competent consultation takes place there will be less grumbling. If parish leaders effectively manage the polarities of maintaining standards and the need for flexibility in enforcing standards there will be less grumbling and more energy given to the building of the Body. 

 

rag+

 


[1] First and foremost, there must be no word or sign of the evil of grumbling, no manifestation of it for any reason at all.  (The Rule 34:6)

[2] Do not grumble or speak ill of others. Place your hope in God alone. [The Rule 4: 39-41] 

[3] Whoever needs less should thank God and not be distressed, but whoever needs more should feel humble because of his weakness, not self-important because of the kindness shown him. In this way all the members will be at peace. [The Rule 34: 3 – 5]

[4] Furthermore, the disciples' obedience must be given gladly, for God loves a cheerful giver (II Cor 9: 7).  If a disciple obeys grudgingly and grumbles, not only aloud but also in his heart, then, even though he carries out the order, his action will not be accepted with favor by God, who sees that he is grumbling in his heart.  He will have no reward for service of this kind; on the contrary, he will incur punishment for grumbling, unless he changes for the better and makes amends. [The Rule 5: 16 – 19]

[5] The Rule 35: 12 - 18

[6] A PDF on “Resistance to Change.” This isn’t the same thing as the grumbling – taking counsel issue but it is related.

[7] Demand system - We all get caught up in all the “cares and occupations of our life.” In organization development there is an assumption that as individuals and organizations we have a “demand system” — the web of expectations and pressures calling for our energy, time and money. The demands may be external or internal. The person’s workplace, family, friends and community all ask for time, energy and money to be used in their direction. It’s the natural consequence of being in a society. We also have internal hopes and expectations — become a better person, lose weight, make more money or make enough to support the family. Everyone has a regular flow of tasks they must attend to. There’s the occasional crisis, problems to solve and deadlines to meet. There are meals to prepare and bills to pay. We also get caught up in work that just isn’t very important. Most of us have some routines that are busy-work or time wasters.  For more on the parish demand system see In Your Holy Spirit: Shaping the Parish Through Spiritual Practice, R. A. Gallagher p. 16

[8] The competition is something that has grown since the Second World War. Before the war the tendency was for the various sectors of a person’s life to engage in mutual accommodation. Over time that has shifted into competition. Many people experience the need to reduce one sector to allow time and energy for another. So we work more and see our family less. Or we drift into a place where we have few close friends, possibly no close friends. Parish churches will serve people more effectively if: 1) we begin with the reality as it is in the culture and 2) we seek ways to offer members ways to live with integrity and humility as they manage the competing forces.

[9] The Rule 3:3

 

Caesura    The web page
A program for parish churches
Vaccinating against conflict
Nurturing healthy relationships

 

A List of All Postings

Saturday
Jul112015

Caesura: Parish life lacking any sort of contemplative focus

Abbot Basil, OSB provided the homily at the evening Eucharist on the Feast of Saint Benedict.  He mentioned Esther de Waal's early influence on him. He said something about her speaking at St. Paul's, Seattle some years ago. He had read "Seeking God" in the 1990s.  

 

de Waal  wrote "Seeking God: The Way of St. Benedict" in 1984. That was a year after the Order of the Ascension started. We picked up on her book rather quickly. It influenced the phrasing of the Promise we take and parts of our Rule. A few years later, 1989, she wrote "Living with Contradiction: An Introduction to Benedictine Spirituality." I only recently have been looking at that book on my Kindle. The quote below is from the preface to a later edition. 

 

It is very fascinating to see how, in the ten years since this book was first written, increasing numbers of lay people like myself are turning to the monastic tradition. Here they find support on their Christian journey which they often fail to find in the institutional church, where parish and diocesan life can be extremely busy, and seemingly lacking in any sort of contemplative focus. [Esther de Waal in "Living with Contradiction: An Introduction to Benedictine Spirituality" 1997 edition]

I heard echos of this in Basil's sermon. It was part of a recent conversation with friends a few weeks ago and in messages from two relatively new Christians at St. Paul's since then. 

It's at the heart of what we have given ourselves to in the Order of the Ascension -- to influence parishes to reduce the busy work and institutional obsession and focus on the primary ministry of the baptized and grounding women and men in the threefold Benedictine pattern - mass, daily office, reflectiveness.

Is it really necessary for those in the parish of Apostolic faith and practice, and those progressing toward that, to go outside the parish for food? When that happens our parishes lose something of the grounding these people can provide for parish life. I believe it’s also related to an increased likelihood of parish conflict, a tendency toward superficial and sentimental religion, the overburdening of the clergy, and a weakening of the dynamic their presence offers in drawing others more deeply into the Christian life.

It’s a twofold action.

1. Reduce the busyness of parish life. Some have started with Sunday morning. How to make the Eucharist and the time around the Eucharist an experience of calmness and lightness instead of rushing and anxiety.

2. Focus attention of the daily life of the baptized (in family, with friends, in workplace and civic life) and grounding women and men in the threefold Benedictine pattern - mass, Office, reflectiveness (Lectio, contemplation, personal devotions connecting prayer with daily life, long walks, whatever works!). Some have started by looking at the message the parish web site sends – is the impression given that the ministry of the laity is primarily about the internal life of the parish, its committees and projects and programs? Is there much on the site that points people to, and resources them for, a more grounded and stable life of prayer?

 

rag+

 

Caesura    The web page
A program for parish churches
Vaccinating against conflict
Nurturing healthy relationships